NSU Newsroom

SharkBytes

Horizons

This version of NSU News has been archived as of February 28, 2019. To search through archived articles, visit nova.edu/search. To access the new version of NSU News, visit news.nova.edu.

This version of SharkBytes has been archived as of February 28, 2019. To search through archived articles, visit nova.edu/search. To access the new version of SharkBytes, visit sharkbytes.nova.edu.

News Releases Archive

Contact

Division of Public Relations and Marketing Communications
Nova Southeastern University
3301 College Avenue
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33314-7796

nova.edu/prmc

SharkBytes Archives

Contact

Division of Public Relations and Marketing Communications
Nova Southeastern University
3301 College Avenue
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33314-7796

communications@nova.edu

Voter Eligibility Laws Could Determine Control of U.S. Senate

NSU Professor Charles Zelden Sees Tossup Races Nov. 4 Tied to Voter Reaction to Constricted Electorate 

FORT LAUDERDALE-DAVIE, Fla. – The hottest question in politics – which party will control the next U.S. Senate – is likely to come down to how many Americans are allowed to vote and how they react to tightened eligibility laws.elephant x donkey 2

“New and expanded laws regulating voter eligibility haven’t been this critical to election outcomes over the last few election cycles,” said political scientist and Professor Charles Zelden, Ph.D., of Nova Southeastern University (NSU). “Voter eligibility has been constricting for a decade and will reach its peak relevancy in next month’s elections.’’

Control of the U.S. Senate hangs in the balance because at least eight states – Alaska, Arkansas, Georgia, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana and North Carolina – have races so close that party turnout will be the key, Zelden said. The outgoing Senate is comprised of 53 Democrats, two independents who caucus with Democrats and 45 Republicans. On Nov. 4, 34 of the 100 Senate seats are up.

“If Democrats can get enough of their voters to the polls, they will retain control of the Senate; if they don’t, they won’t,” Zelden said. “But where the votes are close, turnout is going to depend not just on who shows up to vote, but on who is allowed to vote under the new voter ID laws.”

Among many examples is North Carolina, which has one of the toughest voter ID laws on the books. Incumbent Democrat Kay Hagan leads Republican challenger Thom Tillis in most polls but by just a few percentage points – spreads that are within the error margins.

The growing number of tightened eligibility laws would appear to favor Republicans, who have championed this kind of legislation. However, Zelden said that hostile reactions by voters to these laws would favor Democrats.

“Democrats always need a turnout push in non-presidential years, and this issue could ignite them in numbers big enough to keep them in control of the Senate, if the party exploits the issue,” he observed.

Republicans have positioned eligibility laws as necessary impediments to fraud at the polls. Democrats contend that instances of polling fraud are insignificant and the laws amount to voter suppression.

Zelden said that the voter suppression argument is inherently emotional and there were instances in the 2012 and 2008 presidential elections where constricting the vote had the effect of bringing out Democrats at higher levels. In a mid-term election season like this one, he said it’s difficult to see whether emotions will ride high enough to have the same effect.

Pre-election polling has become less dependable in recent years because so many samples are conducted through automated robo-calling and many young and minority constituencies aren’t reachable by traditional land line phones, Zelden said. Polling questions about voter ID laws linked to voters’ willingness to turn out aren’t being asked widely, so this issue can’t be reliably tracked.

“Pollsters need to be asking people if they are more likely to vote because someone is trying to take their vote away,” Zelden said.

“Both sides benefit from their respective positions,” Zelden said. “Democrats push inclusion and an expanding electorate works for them.  Republicans on the other hand have a more reliable voter base, and expansion of voters and voting hours doesn’t help them in relation to the aid it gives their opponents.”

# # #

About Nova Southeastern University: Situated on 314 beautiful acres in Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, Nova Southeastern University (NSU) is a dynamic research institution dedicated to providing high-quality educational programs at all levels.  NSU is a not-for-profit independent institution with 26,000 students. NSU awards associate’s, bachelor’s, master’s, specialist, doctoral and first-professional degrees in a wide range of fields. NSU is classified as a research university with “high research activity” by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, and it is one of only 37 universities nationwide to also be awarded Carnegie’s Community Engagement Classification. For more information, please visit www.nova.edu. Celebrating 50 years of academic excellence!

Media Contact:
Julie Spechler | Office of Public Affairs
954-262-5348 (office)
954-591-3361 (cell)
julies@nova.edu

Ed Miller |  Fahlgren Mortine
614-383-1616 (office)
614-704-6578 (cell)
Edward.Miller@Fahlgren.com